A sudden intake of breath

Emily Rosa is the youngest person to have a paper published in a peer reviewed medical journal. Her story is an inspiring one, how at age nine she conducted research that debunked therapeutic touch. Little wonder that the tale is often told, including, in 2011, by Michael Shermer at a talk he gave right here in Ottawa.

I was in the audience that night, sitting with a group of friends: my wife, a female scientist friend of ours, and various other acquaintances. Now the exact words are forgotten and the reason why he told the story is forgotten but I do remember how it ended, which was by flashing up on the screen an image of the adult Emily Rosa in a bikini with a comment that was something like, “and look what she grew up to be.”

And – certainly from our little corner of the auditorium – there was a sudden and sharp intake of breath.

Shermer gave a great talk that night, entertaining, educational, fascinating,  but when we were talking afterwards among ourselves, several people mentioned the picture of Emily Rosa in a bikini. It was incongruous, it was odd, and it made at least several people that I know of uncomfortable.

Maybe there wasn’t a point; perhaps it was just supposed to lighten up the talk at midway. I’m sure no harm or offense was intended, and yet… I’ve talked about this specific moment since then, over a year after Shermer gave the talk, and had a few more people say that yes, they remember that slide and that, yes, it was… odd. One person recalled that moment without my prompting them. That it was incongruent. Uncomfortable. Yet another person spontaneously said, when I asked if they remembered Shermer’s talk, “oh yes, that was the really sexist one.” Why? Because so many of the images he’d used to illustrate optical illusions were of parts of women’s bodies (or things that look they are).

So: Shermer came to Ottawa and gave a very interesting talk, but a talk where many of the images used were of women’s bodies and where at least one of the female bodies shown was to illustrate a story about a nine year old girl scientist. As one of my female friends said, “it’s like it was a talk for boys but a bunch of women had inexplicably also been invited.” Again, this was an unprompted comment after being asked if they remembered his presentation.

Many of us know, and indeed are, women, and it’s a good idea to think about how women might respond to a communication style heavy on close ups of female bodies and bikini shots. I’ve sufficient evidence from my peer group to tell me that Shermer’s talk was not a universal hit among that group of people. It’s worth considering why that might be. And if he’s still giving this particular talk, with these particular visual aids, It’s time to stop. Skepticism isn’t a boy’s club anymore.

Comments

10 Responses to “A sudden intake of breath”


  1. Adam Says:

    As a man, I feel obligated to say that even if the audience WAS only made up of men, it still wouldn’t be OK. Objectification of women’s bodies isn’t wrong just in a certain context or in front of a certain audience – it’s ALWAYS wrong. It’s never OK, and not all men are comfortable with it and only refrain from doing so just to make the women around them feel better.



  2. JP Says:

    Adam: Agreed. I was a man at this talk and felt very uncomfortable at times with the presentation style, and probably wasn’t the only man to feel that way either. It just so happens that all the negative feedback I had personally heard in regards to this talk came from women. I could ask around a bit more. Certainly from my point of view, it wasn’t a successful communication style. Two years or so later and I can’t remember what the point of the talk was, but I do remember, very clearly, that dismissive comment about Emily Rosa. It was unnecessary and unpleasant.



  3. ESADPLZ Says:

    What a bunch of fucking hysterical lunatics. OH NOES A FEMALE WAS PICTURED IN A BIKINI!!! RAPIST!! MOLESTER!!!!! SEX ASSAULT!!! Fuck right off, wackjobs.



  4. Adam Says:

    ESADPLZ: Ummm… did I (or JP, for that matter) at any point accuse anyone of rape, molestation or sexual assault?



  5. Elisa D. Kane Says:

    So: Shermer came to Ottawa and gave a very interesting talk, but a talk where many of the images used were of women’s bodies and where at least one of the female bodies shown was to illustrate a story about a nine year old girl scientist. As one of my female friends said, “it’s like it was a talk for boys but a bunch of women had inexplicably also been invited.” Again, this was an unprompted comment after being asked if they remembered his presentation.



  6. cheap Kings jerseys Says:

    Rangers design your own baseball jerseys



  7. masturbation Says:

    Thanks for finally talking about > A sudden intake of breath | Plausibility.net < Loved it!



  8. CurtisCoedo Says:

    ?????????? ????? ?????? – ???????????? ??????????? ???????????? (??? ???).
    ??? ????????????, ??? ??????? ?????? ????????? ????? ?? ??, ??? ???????? ?????? ???? ??? ?? ????? ?? ?????? ?????.
    ?????? ?????? ??????????, ??? ???? 3% ??????? ?????-?????????? ????? ? ?? ?????????????.
    ?? ????? ????????
    ?? ?????? ??? ???????? ??????? ???????? ????? ????? ?? ?????? ?????.
    ? ???? ??????? ???? ?????????? ???????????? ??????????? ???????????? ??????? – ??? ????? ??? ???????????.
    ??? ?????????? ??? ??????? ????? ??????????, ????? ???? ??? ?????????? ?? ???? ????????????? ???? ??????????? ????.
    ??? ??????? “?? ???????????? ???????”, ????? ????, ??? ?? ??????????? ??? ??????????? ???????.
    ????? ???????????, ??? ??????????? ????????? ?? ??? ?????????? ? ???????? ???????, ?????? ?????????? ?? ??? ?????????? ???????.
    ??? ???????? ???? ??????
    ? ???????? ???????? ????? ?????? ? ???????????? ?????? ????? ??????, ?????? ?????? ? ???????: “???????????? ??????????? ????????????”.
    ??????????? ????????????, ? ?? ???????????.

    34j5c6h86



  9. Authorigon78t Says:

    http://epromocjazdrowia.pl/motoryzacja-a-postep.php
    Purchasing a used or new car can be a challenging process unless you know what you will be undertaking. By educating yourself about car shopping prior to head to the dealership, you possibly can make stuff simpler for yourself. The following advice will help your upcoming store shopping trip become more enjoyable.

    Usually deliver a technician coupled when looking for a new automobile. Vehicle merchants are well known for promoting lemons and you do not want to be their up coming patient. Provided you can not get yourself a technician to think about automobiles along, no less than ensure that you have him look at your closing selection prior to buying it.

    Know your limitations. Prior to starting buying for your upcoming auto or van, choose how much you can manage to shell out, and follow it. Don’t neglect to feature interest in your estimations. You are likely to pay out close to twenty percent as a payment in advance at the same time, so prepare yourself.

    Just before seeing a dealership, know what kind of automobile you would like. Analysis each one of you choices prior to shopping so you can determine what works best for your finances and loved ones requirements. Do your research to determine exactly how much you ought to pay for any potential automobile.

    Prior to signing any contract take the time to read through every series, such as the small print. When there is nearly anything detailed that you just do not recognize, do not indication up until you have an response which you fully grasp. Unsavory salesmen are able to use an agreement to insert many charges which were not talked about.

    When you keep your previous advice at heart when that you go purchasing a vehicle, you will certainly be very likely to get a better deal. Buying a vehicle does not have to become headaches. Use the guidelines from this article and you may have the automobile you need at the good price.



  10. Vincenttwero Says:

    ???? ????? ?????? – ???????????? ??????????? ???????????? .
    ??? ????????????, ??? ??????? ?????? ????????? ????? ?? ??, ??? ???????? ?????? ????? ??? ?? ????? ?? ?????? ?????.
    ?????? ?????? ??????????, ??? ???? 5% ??????? ?????-?????????? ????? ?? ????.
    ?? ????? ????????
    ?????? ??? ???????? ???????? ??????? ? ????? ?????? ?? ?????? ?????.
    ? ???? ??????? ???? ?????????? ???????????? ??????????? ???????????? ??????? – ??? ????? ??? ???????????.
    ?????????? ? ??? ??? ??????? ????????? ?????????, ????? ????? ???? ??? ?????????? ?? ?????? ????????????? ???? ??????????? ????.
    ??? ??????? “?? ???????????? ???????”, ????? ????, ??? ?? ????????? ??? ?????? ????????.
    ????? ???????, ??? ??????????? ????????? ?? ??? ?????????? ? ???????? ???????, ?????? ?????????? ?? ??? ?????????? ?????? ????????? ????.
    ??? ???????? ???? ??????
    ? ???????? ???????? ????? ?????? ? ???????????? ?????? ????? ??????, ?????? ?????? ? ???????: “???????????? ??????????? ????????????”.
    ? ?????? ????????????, ? ?? ???????????.

    34j5c6h86